NAIRA III
naira
pdf (Español (España))

Keywords

photo
photography
cameratrap

How to Cite

Pulido, Luis Fernando, Claudia Isaza, and Diaz-Pulido Diaz-Pulido. 2018. “NAIRA III”. Mammalogy Notes 5 (1-2), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.47603/manovol5n1.39-44.
Received 2019-10-03
Published 2018-01-15

Abstract

NAIRA III uses computational intelligence techniques to extract metadata, create databases, help species tagging and automatically classify captured species into trap camera images. This performs the image processing in seven steps: the first step consists in extracting the metadata related to the information corresponding to the precise moment of the photographic capture, such as date, time and geographical coordinates (when the camera records this information), and the information that is printed in the photo frame such as the moon phase, temperature or camera code (Figure 1). The extracted data is organized in a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format, which has been built following the Darwin Core format standards.

https://doi.org/10.47603/manovol5n1.39-44
pdf (Español (España))

References

BRUNELLI, R. & T. POGGIOT. 1997. Template matching: Matched spatial filters and beyond. Pattern Recognition 30: 751–768.

CARBONE, C. et al. 2001. The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Animal Conservation 4: 75–79.

CLEMENTS, J. F., et al. (2015). The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2015. URL: http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/IOC

DIAZ-PULIDO, A. et al. 2016. Fototrampeo. Pp 24–25. En Biodiversidad 2016. Estado y tendencias de la biodiversidad continental de Colombia. (Moreno LA, et al. eds.), Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, D. C., Colombia.

FEGRAUS, E.H. et al. 2011. Data acquisition and management software for camera trap data: A case study from the TEAM Network. Ecological Informatics 6: 345–353.

KARANTH, K.U. & J.D. NICHOLS. 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79: 2852–2862.

KARANTH, K.U. et al. 2004. Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 4854–4858.

KRISHNAPPA, Y.S. & W.C. TURNER. 2014. Software for minimalistic data management in large camera trap studies. Ecological informatics 24: 11–16.

MURCIA, C. et al. 2014. Fuzzy classifiers tuning through an adaptive memetic algorithm. IEEE Latin America Transactions 12: 197–204.

ROWCLIFFE, J.M. & C. CARBONE. 2008. Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future? Animal Conservation 11: 185–186.

YU, X., et al. 2013. Automated identification of animal species in camera trap images. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing: 52.

WILSON D.E & D.M. REEDER. 2005. Mammal Species of the World. A taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third edition.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.