First records for Hydrochoerus isthmius Goldman, 1912 (Rodentia: Hydrochaeridae) in coastal wetlands from northern Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia
Julieth A. Prieto-Rodríguez*1
y 2
Juan
Salvador Mendoza-Roldán 2
1 Corporación Autónoma Regional del Magdalena- CORPAMAG, Santa Marta, Colombia.
2 Universidad del Norte, Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla, Colombia.
* Correspondence: prietoaj@uninorte.edu.co
Resumen
Presentamos los primeros reportes de Hydrochoerus isthmius para la zona costera de la vertiente norte de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, departamento de Magdalena, Caribe colombiano. Evidencias directas (cámaras trampa, restos óseos, fotografías in situ) e indirectas (huellas y excretas), comprueban la ocurrencia de esta especie para los humedales costeros ubicados entre dos áreas protegidas del sistema de Parques Nacionales; PNN Tayrona y Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta.
Palabras clave: Área de distribución, Hydrochoerus isthmius, humedales, Caribe colombiano
Abstract
In this note, we present the first reports for the Hydrochoerus isthmius in the northeastern coastal border of the Magdalena department (Colombia). Records were based on direct evidence (Camera traps, skeletal remains, in situ photographs) and indirect evidence (scats and tracks). We evidenced that the species inhabits coastal wetlands located between two national parks, Tayrona and Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta.
Keywords: Lesser capybara Distribution area, wetlands Colombian Caribbean.
Hydrochoerus isthmius is a large and semiaquatic rodent that is locally known in the Colombian Caribbean region as “ponche”, and valued as an important source of protein for local consumption, although its meat is also sold as bushmeat in illegal markets (Aldana-Domínguez et al., 2002; Quinceno et al., 2015). Some authors consider H. isthmius populations as a different species, sister to H. hydrochaeris (Aldana-Domínguez et al., 2007), while others consider it a geographical subspecies (Ruiz-García et al. 2016). The Capybara (H. hydrochaeris) is distributed east to the Andes, extending throughout the llanos orientales, reaching southern Colombia in Caqueta, Putumayo, and Amazonas departments (Aldana-Domínguez et al., 2007). The lesser capybara (H. isthmius), is distributed in Colombia west to the Andes, including the Atlantic versant, Magdalena Valley, Cauca, and Sinú rivers, extending through Chocó, in western Colombia (Wilson & Reader 2005, Aldana-Dominguez et al. 2007, Aldana-Dominguez et al. 2013). Solari et al. (2013) lists H. isthmius as a valid species for Colombia, with records in Magdalena, Sucre, Antioquia, Chocó, Cordoba, and Valle del Cauca departments.
It is known that some of the areas within the species range, have not been surveyed due to the internal armed conflict (Aldana-Dominguez et al. 2007). Consequently, the distribution of H. isthmius in Magdalena department has been poorly documented. The scarce published reports for Magdalena, include sightings in two national protected areas located west of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Parque Isla Salamanca, and Santuario de Fauna y Flora Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta (Moreno-Bejarano & Álvarez-León, 2003). Furthermore, the species has been recorded within areas covered by African palm crops, at the municipality of El Piñon, Magdalena (Madriñan & Rojas-Salazar, 2018).
The study site is located between two protected areas, limiting southwest with Tayrona National Natural Park, at Piedras river (11º17ʼ46,40ʼʼ N, 73º53ʼ32,88ʼʼ W), and limiting North East with Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta National Natural Park, at Don Diego river (11º15ʼ28,72ʼʼ N, 73º42ʼ8,36ʼʼ W), ranging in elevations between 8-13 m (Figure 1). Five main rivers drain down the Northern versant of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta to the Caribbean Sea in the Magdalena Department (Piedras river, Mendihuaca River, Guachaca River, Buritaca River, and Don Diego River). These river deltas, form species-rich coastal wetlands and mangrove forests. Natural habitats within the study site are locally threatened by the expansion of the agriculture, cattle ranching, development of urbanizations, and touristic infrastructure (Allan et al., 2019; Rangel Buitrago, 2008). These wetlands generate habitat for multiple threatened species including river otters Lontra longicaudis (Trujillo et al., 2017).
FIGURE 1. Records of the Lesser capybara reported between June 2019 and November 2020 for six localities in the department of Magdalena, Colombia.
FIGURE 2. Habitat of H. isthmius in the north eastern Coastal border of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, A) Coastal wetlands, Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre B) Banana monoculture near the seashore in Buritaca.
Records on the presence of the species were made during fieldwork between 2019 and 2020. Diurnal and nocturnal searches, were carried out along two kilometer long transects, inspected both by foot and on board of a small boat for each of the six surveyed areas. In these transects we registered evidence on the presence of H. isthmius with the use of a GPS and a digital camera. The use of camera traps during the study was specifically to monitor predator and non-predator species that visited nesting and basking areas used by American crocodiles (Crocodylus acutus), for this purpose we installed a total of six cameras each year from 12 April to 20 September, for a total of 93 nights of sampling in 2019 and 124 nights of sampling in 2020.
We registered a total of 25 observations on H. isthmius, for six localities (Piedras River, Guachaca River, Buritaca River, Mendihuaca River, Don Diego River and Playa Bonita-Quebrada Valencia) eight based on photographs and videos from camera traps, six direct observations in the field, nine based on scats and tracks, and two remains from dead individuals (Table 1).
The species was registered along the water edge of coastal lagoons, utilizing Mangrove forests, as well as banana plantations (Musa paradisiaca), and cacao crops (Theobroma cacao) as habitat (Figure 2), moving along nesting and basking areas used by the American crocodile. Scats and tracks were found in congregation sites used by lesser capybaras for mud bathing and grazing (Figure 4A). The species shows predominantly nocturnal activity patterns, that may extend to morning hours (19:10-05:18), being less frequently observed during daytime. Most photographs taken by camera traps show solitary individuals (seven from eight recordings). A single group, formed by two adults, three subadults and four juveniles was filmed during August 2020, in a mangrove forest from the locality of Playa Bonita (Figure 3A).
In this note we evidenced the presence of H. isthmius in wetlands comprised between two protected areas: Tayrona National Natural Park (Piedras River) and Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta National Natural Park (Don Diego River), representing the first confirmed records for the studied localities.
Table 1. Lesser capybara (H. isthmius) records for the study area. Column #ind, specifies number of individuals recorded, (G) evidence of tracks from more than one individual or group.
Locality |
Record |
Date |
Hour |
Latitude |
Longitud |
# ind. |
Habitat type |
|
|||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Camera trap |
23-Jun-19 |
22:26 |
11.257393 |
-73.795232 |
1 |
Crocodile nesting area |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Skeletal remains |
15-Jul-19 |
|
11.256042 |
-73.794748 |
1 |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Camera trap |
17-Aug-19 |
2:24 |
11.253413 |
-73.79558 |
1 |
Cacao plantation |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Scats and tracks |
18-Aug-19 |
|
11.253683 |
-73.79558 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Direct observation |
14-Jan-20 |
22:08 |
11.254999 |
-73.79176 |
1 |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Camera trap |
23-Mar-20 |
5:18 |
11.257121 |
-73.794889 |
1 |
Crocodile nesting area |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Camera trap |
15-May-20 |
5:11 |
11.25636 |
-73.794168 |
1 |
Crocodile nesting area |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Scats and tracks |
26-Jul-20 |
|
11.253808 |
-73.796084 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Camera trap |
6-Aug-20 |
3:06 |
11.253841 |
-73.791962 |
9 |
Mangrove forest border |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Tracks |
11-Nov-20 |
|
11.253808 |
-73.796084 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Playa Bonita-Quebrada del Tigre |
Scats and tracks |
11-Oct-19 |
|
11.254932 |
-73.781437 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Buritaca |
Scats and tracks |
12-Dec-19 |
|
11.254101 |
-73.790625 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Buritaca |
Camera trap |
24-Feb-20 |
21:39 |
11.254101 |
-73.790625 |
1 |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Buritaca |
Direct observation |
12-Mar-20 |
21:41 |
11.262646 |
-73.766696 |
1 |
Banana plantation |
||||
Buritaca |
Direct observation |
12-Mar-20 |
19:15 |
11.262693 |
-73.766211 |
2 |
Banana plantation |
||||
Buritaca |
Tracks |
3-Mar-20 |
|
11.258767 |
-73.769945 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Don Diego |
Scats and tracks (Mud bathing site) |
29-Jan-20 |
|
11.25798 |
-73.702324 |
G |
Grassland, mangrove forest border |
||||
Don Diego |
Direct observation |
20-Sep-20 |
20:00 |
11.249303 |
-73.707817 |
1 |
Banana plantation |
||||
Guachaca |
Scats and tracks |
8-Aug-19 |
|
11.265006 |
-73.825647 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Guachaca |
Individual killed in noose trap |
20-Feb-20 |
|
11.266263 |
-73.831293 |
1 |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Mendihuaca |
Scats and tracks |
23-Nov-19 |
|
11.27544 |
-73.8609 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Mendihuaca |
Tracks |
16-Sep-19 |
|
11.27369 |
-73.858819 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Mendihuaca |
Tracks |
29-Feb-20 |
|
11.269458 |
-73.8394 |
G |
Mangrove forest |
||||
Rio Piedras |
Camera trap |
4-Feb-20 |
19:10 |
11.296223 |
-73.892469 |
1 |
Crocodile basking area |
||||
Rio Piedras |
Camera trap |
19-Jun-20 |
20:47 |
11.296783 |
-73.892469 |
1 |
Crocodile basking area |
||||
The species was not prioritized in the Conservation and Management Plan for the Aquatic mammals from Magdalena Department (Trujillo et al., 2017), thus knowledge on the range at the Magdalena department remains scarce and no data exists regarding population trends and conservation status. We highlight that the species has not been included in the management plans from neither of the two mentioned national parks. During fieldwork we encountered the remains from two dead individuals, one of the corpses had its right ankle partially mutilated by the action of a noose trap (Figure 4C, D), proving that the species is hunted in the study area.
The accelerated growth of extensive agriculture, urban spaces, roads, and touristic infrastructure are main threats for wetlands through landfills and deforestation. Banana monocultures have extended throughout the study site, replacing natural habitats, and reducing original forest covers to small patches (Figure 2B). However, inside these plantations there is restricted access to personnel, and it is strictly prohibited to hunt wildlife, conditions that make them a favorable habitat for the presence of the species that uses artificial water channels to find shelter, fresh water, and grazing areas. The number of observations recorded with camera traps during the study period was limited by the number of American crocodile nesting and basking sites detected and by the loss, vandalized and stolen equipment at the study areas of Don Diego River, Playa Bonita-Quebrada Valencia and Buritaca River. The presence of sites with numerous tracks and scats, also prove that the population is not only configured by solitary individuals (Figure 4A).
Lesser capybaras inhabits vulnerable wetland habitats, which require assertive territorial planning for their conservation as they are located outside protected areas, they face numerous threats that accelerate habitat loss for terrestrial and aquatic fauna. This species faces pressures that compromise its survival imposed by hunting for bushmeat. A specific sampling design for the species will allow further studies over aspects such as abundance, age structure, and habitat use, future research on the population trend for the study area could be an initial effort towards its management and conservation.
A
FIGURE 3. Photographic evidence on the presence of H. isthmius for the study area: A) Juveniles from a family group, Playa Bonita (id 9); B) Río Buritaca, Banana plantation direct observation (Id 14); C) Individual transiting through American crocodile basking area, captured by camera trap, Río Piedras (Id 24); D-E) Individual transiting through American crocodile nesting area, captured by camera trap, Playa Bonita (Id 1; 6).
FIGURE 4. Evidence on the presence of the species. A) Río Don Diego- mud bathing site (Id 17); B) Tracks, Playa Bonita, (id 10); C) Skeletal remains, Playa Bonita, (Id 2); D) Dead individual caught in noose trap, Rio Guachaca (Id 20).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research was made possible thanks to Corporación Autónoma Regional del Magdalena CORPAMAG, which funded this work as part of the American crocodile monitoring during 2019 and 2020. We thank Primavera Trujillo, Nathalie Di Sabatino and Juntas de Acción communal Guachaca, Buritaca y Don Diego for their kindness and support during field work We specially thank Dr. Jesus Ballesteros and an anonymous reviewer for their very important suggestions and corrections made to the document, and Dr. Diego Zarrate made important observations. Special thanks to the editors of Mammalogy Notes for allowing us to contribute with this note.
REFERENCES
Aldana-Domínguez J., Forero J., BetancourtJ., Cavelier J. 2002. Dinámica y estructura de la población de chigüiros (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris: Rodentia, Hydrochaeridae) de caño Limón, Arauca, Colombia. Caldasia 24: 445–458.
Arias Alzate A, Acevedo-Quintero JF. 2014. Registros notables del Oso de Anteojos Tremarctos ornatus (Carnivora: Ursidae) en el norte de Antioquia, Colombia. Mammalogy Notes 1:5-6. https://doi.org/10.47603/manovol1n1.5-6
Aldana-Domínguez J, Vieira-Muñoz MI, Ángel-Escobar D.C. 2007 Estudios sobre la ecología del chigüiro (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris), enfocados a su manejo y uso sostenible en Colombia. Bogotá, Instituto Alexander von Humboldt.
Aldana-Domínguez J, Vieira-Muñoz MI, Bejarano P. 2013. Conservation and use of the capybara and the lesser capybara in Colombia. In: Moreira JR, Ferraz KM, Herrera EA, Macdonald DW, editors. Capybara: biology, use and conservation of an exceptional Neotropical species. New York, USA. Springer. p. 321-332.
Allan JR, Watson JE, Di Marco M, O’Bryan CJ, PossinghamHP, Atkinson SC, Venter O. 2019. Hotspots of human impact on threatened terrestrial vertebrates. PLoS Biology17: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000158
Ballesteros J, Jorgenson J. 2009. Aspectos poblacionales del cacó (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris isthmius) y amenazas para su conservación en el noroccidente de Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 16:27-38.
Madriñán L, Rojas Salazar L. 2018. Fauna y flora en áreas con cultivos de palma de aceite en el norte y oriente de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Occurrence dataset. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1846726254 . Accessed on 30 July 2020.
Moreno-BejaranoLM, Álvarez-LeónR. 2003. Fauna asociada a los manglares y otros humedales en el delta-estuario del río Magdalena, colombia.Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales (ACCEFYN) 27: 517–534.
Quinceno MP, Van Vliet N, Moreno J, Cruz AD. 2015. Diagnóstico sobre el comercio de carne de monte en las ciudades de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Centro para la Investigación Forestal Internacional (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/005740
Rangel Buitrago, NG. 2008. Evolución Histórica y Geomorfología De La Línea De Costa Adyacente a La Sierra Nevada De Santa Marta Entre El Cabo San Juan De Guía y El Río Cañas. Tesis de grado Maestria en Ciencias de la Tierra. Medellin, Antioquia: Universidad EAFIT.
Ruíz-García, Luengas-Villamil K, Leal L, Bernal-Parra LM, Shostell JM. 2016. Phylogenetics and phylogeography of two large Neotropical rodents (Capybara, Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, hydrochaeridae and paca, Cunniculis paca, agoutidae; Rodentia) by means of mitochondrial genes: Opposite patterns In: Urbano KV, editor. Advances in Genetics. New York, USA. Nova Science Publisher. p. 2-50.
Solari S, Muñoz-Saba Y, Rodríguez-Mahecha JV, Defler T, Ramírez-Chaves HE,Trujillo F. 2013. Riqueza, endemismos y conservación de los mamíferos de Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 20: 301-365.
Trujillo F, Ortiz-Gómez EP, Mosquera-Guerra F, Prieto J, Jáuregui A, Pabón-Aldana K. 2017. Plan de Conservación y Manejo de Mamíferos Acuáticos (cetáceos, manatíes y nutrias) del Departamento del Magdalena. Santa Marta, Colombia: CORPAMAG, Fundación Omacha, Fundación Museo del Mar y Acuario y Museo del Mar Fospina S.A.S.
Wilson DE, Reeder DM. 2005. Mammal Species of the World. Third Edition. Baltimore, USA. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Editor: Diego J. Lizcano
Recibido: 2021-03-13
Revisado: 2021-04-20
Aceptado: 2021-05-18
Publicado: 2021-07-10